BLOG RASMI PPIM

NOTIS & PENAFIAN

Segala artikel yang disiarkan di laman blog ini merupakan pandangan peribadi penulis dan ianya tidak mewakili mana-mana parti, orginasasi atau mana-mana pertubuhan. Jika berlaku sebarang kecelaruan emosi ketika membaca atau menyaksikan bahan-bahan yang dipaparkan ianya di luar tanggungjawab penulis. Ingin berkongsi artikel dan maklumat yang menarik emelkan kepada : yuseriyusoff@gmail.com

Monday, March 11, 2013

Part 1 : Kebenaran di Sebalik Liwat II


Kelakar apabila melihat para pejuang-pejuang saibertrupers pembangkang yang begitu menjulang Azlan Mohd Lazim seolah-olah apa yang dikatakan olehnya adalah sebuah kebenaran, malah ada yang menganggap pengakuan bapa Saiful Bukhari ini sebagai 'anugerah' dan 'petunjuk' dari Allah SWT menjelang PRU13.

Beginilah sikap ketaksuban yang ada dalam setiap kepala otak totok pembangkang di Malaysia, apabila seseorang individu atau sesuatu perkara yang menyebelahi pihak maka tanpa prejudis diangkat individu tersebut sehingga gagal berfikir secara waras.

Sebagai contoh, jika dahulu Mat Sabu, Karpal Singh antara orang yang kuat menjaja cerita kononnya Anwar Ibrahim seorang peliwat. Hari ini kita melihat mereka mengatakan sebaliknya, malah sang peliwat ini diangkat sebagai ketua oleh mereka.

Begitu juga kes melibatkan bapa Saiful Bukhari, sebelum ini beria pihak pembangkang mendakwa bapa Saiful Bukhari ini seorang kaki judi sehingga sanggup melacurkan isterinya, hari ini tuduhan itu bertukar menjadi sebaliknya.

Sebelum ini Chegu Bard sendiri dengan tegas mendedahkan siapakah Azlan Mohd Lazim, sebagaimana disiarkan di bawah :


Tetapi hari ini, saudara boleh melihat sendiri bagaimana mereka menjulang bapa Saiful Bukhari - adakah mereka fikir rakyat hari ini terlalu bodoh sehingga gagal mengingati setiap kenyataan yang dibuat oleh mereka sebelum ini?

Melihat dari tindakan dan setiap kenyataan yang berubah yang selalu diamalkan oleh pemimpin, pengikut hinggalah tindakan Azlan Mohd Lazim sendiri, kita sewajarnya menggunakan akal yang waras sebelum mempercayai bahawa dakwaan yang dibuat itu adalah sebuah kebenaran...


Mungkin selepas ini cerita Anwar Ibrahim sengaja membiarkan diri memasuki 'perangkap seks' yang disediakan oleh UMNO bakal kembali popular.

Kahkahkahkah!


Dari FMT :
The real story of Anwar’s Sodomy 2 ( Part 1)
FMT LETTER: From Yuktes Vijay, via e-mail
I read with anger the news that Saiful’s dad has joined PKR. I knew from Day 1 that the party was devoid of any integrity but for it to stoop to this extent is just mind boggling. I was working with one of Anwar’s long-time lawyers during the whole course of Sodomy 2 and was involved in A-Z of the trial itself.
When I say A-Z, it means from meeting the forensic and DNA experts to reviewing of the documents to finding case laws for his submissions. I was involved in everything. I do not wish to mention the name of the lawyer here as I revere him as my mentor and I do not wish to drag him into this frustration and anger pouring of mine.
Why Anwar never took the stand?
Anwar claimed that he was never offered a fair trial. The truth is he was never brave enough to take the stand. He was never going to withstand the questions that were about to be put forward to his now ally Datuk Yusof. If you Pakatanians have doubts, why not ask him these questions and get valid, acceptable and not logically challenging answers for it.
  • Why did Anwar personally and specifically request his Chief of Staff, Ibrahim Yaakob to send Saiful to the apartment carrying documents when there were other staff there;
  • How come Saiful was aware of the code to enter the apartment which was ‘Mokhtar’, the name of Anwar’s security chief and brother-in-law? ;
  • Video evidence that was sent to Gandhi Labs in New Delhi confirmed the presence of Saiful in the apartment, so how can Saiful’s presence in the apartment be refuted;
  • Why was Saiful afforded special treatment i.e. he was given his own room, privilege of following Anwar for overseas trips though he was a new staff;
  • Anwar’s current aide, Najwan Halimi had previously e-mailed Anwar and told him about Saiful’s apparent afflictions to BN. Why was the call not heeded by Anwar?
Fearing that Anwar will not be able to withstand the onslaught by the Prosecution, the defence team then decided to ask him not to take stand uder the pretext that he was not offered a fair trial. Anwar excelled in conning, deceiving and cheating the public by assuming a Mandela like persona. He is no Mandela, merely a good con artist.
Fund for the overseas experts
The surprising factor here is why no one has ever questioned the fees that were involved in paying the forensic experts, Dr Brian Macdonald and Dr David Wells. Contrary to what the general public have been made to believe, they were paid hefty sums to defend him. When they were here, they stayed in Shang-ri La Hotel for a number of days.
Where did the money to pay the hotels come from? Did Anwar pay from his own pocket? No, he does not even pay his lawyers. So, he had very rich Datuks funding him. I do know the name of the Datuk, but for the reasons known close to me I will not disclose the name.
The problem is if PKR can throw questions as to the wedding expenditure of the Prime Minister, why not question where the money to pay these experts came from? If a former convict and a mere Opposition Leader can have Datuks funding his legal expences, what is wrong in having  Datuks funding the wedding of the PM’s daughter?
Saiful
I don’t know much about Saiful. The only thing I can say is that the reason he was denied justice is that the Investigating Officer, Jude Perreira, ignored the protocols told to him by Jabatan Kimia and decided to do his things his own way.
There were traces of Anwar’s DNA in his rectum. The only thing that stopped the judge from convicting Anwar was the “break in the chain of evidence”. I will write a full piece on this soon. This drama itself deserves a full piece write up.
In a nutshell, there was evidence of Anwar’s semen in Saiful’s rectum. However, due to a break in chain of evidence and the question mark over the integrity of the samples, the evidence was not used.
So the judge had no other way of corroborating Saiful’s evidence.
Conclusion for Part 1
Anwar is a consummate liar. He is using Saiful’s dad to play up his victim role in order to garner votes. We all know for a fact that since he got acquitted he has lost that bit of “charm” about him as he has nothing to yell about anymore. I really hope he sues me so that I can prove in Court what I have just mentioned.
Remember Anwar Ibrahim, I grew up adoring you. I know your modus operandi and I aspired to be you. Sue me please. Let the public watch Anwar vs Anwar clone (which is me) in action.  And  remember the e-mails, Astroboy? I have all of them saved. Come get me!
The writer, a former Anwarista, worked in Anwar’s Sodomy 2 trial for the defence

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

cuba anda fikirkan . perkara utama adalah pendedahan oleh si dia yg dulu menuntut mahkamah rayuan ....menyemak smla..... x ker pelik gitu? bukan soal pembangkang mengangkat si dia.. soal pendedahan... apa yg d dedahkan .. itu perkara utama
...

Anonymous said...

Anon bongok kt atas, cuba ko fikir logik dia temani anak dia sumpah laknat, dia desak AG failkan cepat2 rayuan supaya kes dibicarakan semula, dia maki Majlis Peguam sbb tk bg anak dia buat rayuan. Tiba2 tukar kata ini konspirasi?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

University News Capital

University News Capital
Words Of The Young Minds

BNBBC

Kelab Penyokong Siber The Red Warriors

Kelab Penyokong Siber The Red Warriors
Klik Untuk Ketahui Berita Terkini Pasukan The Red Warriors

HOT MINGGU INI

Mesti Baca All Time HOT Artikel

Dari Kampus

MACAM-MACAM ADO - [U,18SX,18SG,18PL]

News & Portal

Arkib Artikel Kawe...